I’m still undecided about this book, despite having finished
it (after several false starts) over a week ago.
The pluses:
1. It is epic fantasy that is not directly lifted
from The Lord of the Rings. He has made
some effort to ensure that it is his world and that it has its own rules and
its own beings.
2.
Thomas Covenant the Unbeliever is a 20th
century man, transported by mysterious means into this alternate world.
3.
Great Goddess, there must be something else
positive about it—I spent time reading this thing!
The minuses:
1.
Thomas Covenant is a distinctly unlikeable
character. He is cranky, whiney, rude,
violent, stubborn, un-cooperative, you name it.
Always recalcitrant.
2.
There is a rape, which just gets glossed
over. Covenant commits it and really
doesn’t seem to care a whole lot. It’s
just something he did. Even when the
text makes it clear that Lena, the victim, will be considered “ruined” by her
culture because of it. And yes, I was
annoyed about that too—really, being a victim “ruins” someone?
3.
There is a ring, precious! Mind you, its TC’s wedding ring and it’s his
link between his own world and The Land where this adventure is set, but still.
4.
The whole leprosy thing—I guess it was supposed
to explain why TC behaved like a dick all the time, but it didn’t seem like the
right reason to me. And why was he
healed while in The Land, but not healed when he returned to real life? And would people, especially medical
professionals, actually treat him as they are portrayed to?
5.
Names are important to me—Lord Foul and the
cavewight Drool were just the two worst examples.
6.
At the end, Covenant has apparently learned
NOTHING. No change. Still a complete dick. But at least the people of The Land don’t
have to put up with him anymore. Except
there is a whole series of books.
Something tells me they will have to put up with him again.
Hi Wanda
ReplyDeleteI read the first series many years ago when I still read a lot of fantasy, now I read mostly SF. As you said it did seem to be one of the few that was not a LOTR clone
like Terry Brooks but the main character was such an unlikable person it was hard to really get into the story. As you said his leprosy was given as the reason but it was unconvincing.I have to say I was never tempted to reread it or any of his later books. There are just too many other fantasy writers I enjoy like Patricia A. McKillip and Robin McKinley to bother with him.
Regards
Guy
Yes, I am really debating whether I want to read any more of the series, despite my sci fi/fantasy reading project. I believe I will try at least one more before giving up entirely. I am also still on the fence about reading more Piers Anthony, who I find to be a creepy writer (very sexist and seemingly completely unaware of it). I do wonder how these two authors got on the list of all time best???
DeleteWanda