“It is
better to fail in originality than to succeed in imitation.” Herman Melville
Melville was not speaking about Terry Brooks’ Shannara
series, but his words sum up my feelings about the trilogy very well.
Writers have to begin somewhere and learn somehow. If they can get paid for that learning
experience, good on them. Brooks was apparently
attending law school while he wrote the first book, The Sword of Shannara. The
double focus (law school and writing a novel) may the reason that so much of Sword seems to be lifted directly out of
The Lord of the Rings, maybe tweaked
just a smidge, and inserted directly into Sword. If you are feeling kindly, Sword is an homage to LOTR. If you are me, these incidents end up feeling
like a piece of furniture against which I was continually stubbing my toe. It was distracting—instead of enjoying the
story, I’d be identifying and analyzing.
“Oh, that’s X from LOTR and this is Z.”
Stephen King has written, “The road to hell is paved with
adverbs.” See also Elmore Leonard’s
rules of writing—he completely agrees. I
have to concur with both of them, as I found the number of adverbs in Sword to be maddening. I was reading a library copy, so I couldn’t
indulge in my desire to highlight every example with a yellow marker, but if I
had a loonie for every adverb in the text, I would be able to afford quite a
few books! [A loonie, for you
non-Canadians, is a Canadian one dollar coin].
There was also a preponderance of adjectives, often repetitive, that
annoyed me. I mean, how many times do we
need to the told that Menion Leah is “lean”?
The writing was clunky and cluttered.
However, I struggled to the end and I loved the ending of the book—it
was delightful and made me hopeful for the next book in the series.
Thankfully, the second and third books, The Elfstones of Shannara and The Wishsong of Shannara, are much more
original. Brooks has found how to write
in his own voice, rather than trying to be Tolkien. He also seems to have received better
editing, as the number of adverbs and adjectives is pared down to a reasonable
amount. As a result, books two and three
are much more enjoyable, although still not up to the standard of writing of
King or Leonard. The Elfstones of Shannara covers some Elvish history, including the
banishment of all Demons through the spell that created the magical Ellcrys
tree. Although it follows the Tolkien
pattern (i.e., a protagonist who feels inadequate to accomplish the task, who
gets separated from his friends and left to his own devices to find the
required place/thing and succeeds beyond his expectations), Brooks gives it his
own spin. For one thing, the main
character in Elfstones, Wil Ohmsford,
actually gets a romantic interest or two.
(In Sword, Shea Ohmsford
doesn’t rate a romance, only his friend Menion Leah gets a girl—although in
order for Shea to have a grandson to star in the next story, there must have
been romance eventually).
Wishsong follows
the Ohmsford family again, another generation or two along. I particularly enjoyed that it was a talent of Brin and Jair (the Wishsong)
that was powerful, rather than an accessory (the sword or the elfstones). The
introduction of a sympathetic Gnome character, Slanter, was a great addition,
as was the disappearing moor cat Whisper.
The group of people that end up travelling with Jair are, once again,
very reminiscent of The Company of the Ring, but there was enough originality
in the book that it didn’t rub me the wrong way this time. It ends, as all three books do, with the
heroes/heroines realizing that the answers are within themselves.
Maybe if I had never encountered Tolkien I would have been
more enamoured of this trilogy. Instead,
it suffered by comparison. I found that
Brooks plunged the reader directly into the tale with very little background
information—this was no carefully thought out world with back story that is so
obvious in Tolkien. Instead the
background details are provided in awkward little information dumps here and
there within the text, sometimes at the strangest moments. I also wasn’t keen on his character
names—Flick sounded to me like a good dog’s name, but not so good for a
man. Some of his elves have names that
sound more like dwarves to me (Durin and Dayel in Sword, for example). And I
could never read about the Druid Allanon without thinking of the support group
for families of alcoholics, Al-Anon. However,
on the plus side, the name Slanter for a Gnome seemed to fit extremely well.
So, book 1 drove me crazy, but books 2 and 3 redeemed the
series somewhat for me. Although they
are good enough books, I am now done with the world of Shannara—the basic plot
line that repeats through all three books is a grand old theme, but there are
limits to how many times you can lead this old mare to that same well and
expect her to drink. With so many more
enticing books calling to me, I just don’t care enough about the world of
Shannara to pursue it any further.
Hi Wanda
ReplyDeleteI read the first book many years ago and the lifting from LOTR drove me crazy. The sad part was I thought that the only original bit about the troll? hero so revered that he could command instant cooperation was a great plot twist.
Guy
Guy, it's taken me a long time to wend my way through this trilogy and I had forgotten the troll in the first book. You're right, he was awesome. Brooks produces just enough originality to keep the series from being complete dreck. The books following #1 do improve, but he does seem to keep using the same basic plot, just repeated with new characters. I can't see myself reading any further in the series.
ReplyDeleteI'm rather perversely delighted that someone shares my craziness about the LOTR business!
Thanks for that!
Wanda